Monday, August 27, 2012

One frustrating example of the way heterodox economics (of any type) works

Posted by dkuehn at 4:29 PM
I google "Paul Samuelson ergodic axiom 1969", and get a page full of results by...

...Paul Davidson, of course.

If you're scratching your head, don't worry about it. I'll get over it.

14 comments:

  1. AnonymousAugust 27, 2012 at 4:52 PM

    Why?

    ReplyDelete
  2. AbsalonAugust 27, 2012 at 6:13 PM

    Google is spelled with a capital "G".

    ReplyDelete
  3. CurrentAugust 27, 2012 at 6:19 PM

    You're grumbling about it is now hits 3 and 4 for that search query :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. AnonymousAugust 27, 2012 at 6:22 PM

      Well, of course it is a very popular topic.

      Delete
    2. AbsalonAugust 27, 2012 at 6:54 PM

      It is scary good how quickly Google updates its index.

      Delete
  4. Blue AuroraAugust 27, 2012 at 11:57 PM

    Paul Davidson has been attempting to obstruct the work of Dr. Michael Emmett Brady not only at the Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, but at other heterodox outlets.

    Here is Dr. Michael Emmett Brady's review of Paul Davidson's book on John Maynard Keynes. That "J. M. KEYNES" fellow is Paul Davidson himself. Before he changed his username to "J. M. KEYNES", he used his real name of Paul Davidson, until Dr. Michael Emmett Brady pointed out the erroneousness of Davidson's D-Z model and his lack of mathematical competence.

    http://www.amazon.com/review/R1KYGLAQ1WZPRX/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. AnonymousAugust 28, 2012 at 12:04 AM

      Is there ever a comment by you lately that doesn't mention Brady?

      Delete
    2. Blue AuroraAugust 28, 2012 at 2:11 AM

      Joseph Fetz: I do and can think for myself, and there haven been posts on this website where I don't mention Dr. Michael Emmett Brady.

      Delete
    3. AnonymousAugust 28, 2012 at 11:03 AM

      I wasn't only talking about this blog.

      Delete
    4. Blue AuroraAugust 28, 2012 at 11:25 AM

      I *am* capable of going without mentioning Dr. Michael Emmett Brady on the blogosphere.

      Delete
    5. Roman P.August 28, 2012 at 11:55 AM

      Not to be offensive, mate, but you are really odd. You tend to mention Dr. Brady at any opportunity, with his full name no less.

      Delete
    6. AnonymousAugust 28, 2012 at 12:09 PM

      Yes, it is always "Dr. Michael Emmett Brady". I am sure that Blue Aurora is certainly capable of going without mentioning the name, but I don't think that he's done so but a handful of times over the course of the past 2 months. The funny part, and he might be doing this on purpose, is that in his responses telling me that he can go without mentioning Brady's name, he always makes sure to state Brady's full name and title. I have come to four conclusions: He is Brady, he is infatuated with Brady, he is Brady's lover, or he is just screwing with everybody.

      Delete
    7. Blue AuroraAugust 29, 2012 at 3:33 AM

      Roman P.: I understand how that comes off as "really odd". I tend to mention Dr. Michael Emmett Brady whenever I see a chance that he can have some insight to the conversation. I don't take offence at what you say, Roman.

      Joseph Fetz: I am not Dr. Michael Emmett Brady nor am I in love with him. I am merely someone with a deep interest in his research. I find his articles on John Maynard Keynes to be very interesting, so I like to share them with other people. But yes, I do say his full name and title to be very specific as to his work, and I do have a tendency to like saying full names.

      Delete
  5. AnonymousAugust 28, 2012 at 12:49 AM

    Daniel

    Soldiers allegedly plotted to kill Obama, oust government

    http://thehill.com/blogs/defcon-hill/army/245747-soldiers-alleged-plot-to-assassinate-president-overthrow-government-emerges-in-murder-trial

    Stars and Bars, again, my friend

    ReplyDelete

All anonymous comments will be deleted. Consistent pseudonyms are fine.

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)