Kind of strange... he seems to be suggesting I'm saying precisely the opposite of what I'm saying.
I'm quoting Proudhon here because it's relevant and it's always a nice flare to quote people. I think I said pretty clearly I don't exactly agree with him. But I do think Proudhon orients us towards and important point.
This is one area where I think Gene and I are basically of the same mind. So if you think Gene is saying something sensible and I'm saying something objectionable, I might be making my point unclearly.