When you read a criticism of that thinker and find that even when the critic is penning the piece, the thinker being criticized demolishes his critic in the argument.
Usually a critic is at least competent enough to present his target's argument in a way that would make it appear wrong. This particular critic is competent, which just drives home how good the thinker's argument really is.
Dan Carlin’s “Hardcore History”
5 hours ago