I am predisposed to foam at the mouth in disagreement with this post. Three things have prevented me so far - (1.) reading and responding to Henderson and Gochenour, (2.) lots of homework, test taking, midterm grading, and proposal writing, and (3.) not having a clue why Unlearningecon would write something like this "the Division of Labour (DoL) means that it is often impossible to separate the produce of one worker from that of his colleagues."
I feel uncomfortable responding to a point that seems so wrong I wonder if I'm mistunderstanding.
(1.) and (2.) are out of the way for now. I'm not sure how to deal with (3.).
Comparative advantage: a partial truth
4 hours ago