tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1740670447258719504.post7246706393958582810..comments2024-03-27T03:00:27.024-04:00Comments on Facts & other stubborn things: Two more points on the Phillips Curve discussionEvanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12259004160963531720noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1740670447258719504.post-9933623536692111432014-08-05T22:07:09.159-04:002014-08-05T22:07:09.159-04:00I like that second point. It strikes me as an impo...I like that second point. It strikes me as an important point to think about when also evaluating people's references to things like Hayek's statement that there shouldn't be a Nobel Prize, or Solow's more recent screeds against modern macro. Scholars attempting to evaluate the legacy of their own work, even retrospectively, no matter how great they might be, shouldn't be taken at face value.<br /><br />Good to see you back + blogging, Daniel.Pseudonymousnoreply@blogger.com