tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1740670447258719504.post5840066469975248848..comments2024-03-27T03:00:27.024-04:00Comments on Facts & other stubborn things: Bingo!Evanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12259004160963531720noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1740670447258719504.post-24964838992786149472012-12-22T10:14:21.019-05:002012-12-22T10:14:21.019-05:00The difference is one is protected the other is mi...The difference is one is protected the other is military fun.<br />Militia question aside there is an explicit protection of gun ownership for citizens of the United States. Drones are just a way of preventing military solder casualties while carrying out some targeted killing leaders of the military feel must be carried out. The case could be made that drones allow deployment of more deadly force without the need to fret over harm to military personnel. It's all great for the US military but its a practice that requires more and constant scrutiny while gun ownership really doesn't require much scrutiny.Anthony Limahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15923530382897881718noreply@blogger.com