Facts & other stubborn things
Monday, September 17, 2012

Just curious...

›
I found a funky work-around that does the trick for what I'm working on, but since I've gotten good answers from random questions he...
2 comments:

Why do Americans struggle to appreciate the French?

›
Writing the last post on Julia Child made me think of this question. Why is it that Americans sneer at the French so much. And if your ans...
13 comments:

Julia Child wasn't kidding when she said boeuf bourguinon tastes better the second day

›
The only downside is that I didn't bring the wine into work and I am not sitting on the couch next to Kate. We cooked out of my great ...
2 comments:

Scattered thoughts on Henderson on economics and the draft

›
David Henderson gives a great talk on the role of economists in ending the draft - a subject he's written on before. It's inter...
11 comments:

For Constitution Day

›
This is in Jefferson's letter to William Smith in 1787, shortly before the famous "tree of liberty" line. I think it has impor...
3 comments:

Just my opinion

›
If your definition of "good economics" includes Adam Smith and excludes Paul Samuelson, it is at best incomplete. If it calls t...
4 comments:

Why is it that if someone is lecturing you on what to eat and why, it's always either Michael Bloomberg or a libertarian?

›
I agree with Cowen on GMO foods . Everything I know about them suggests that they're not a health risk at all. I don't know how many...
6 comments:
Sunday, September 16, 2012

LHS Musings

›
This is going to sound positively neandthal, but shouldn't the left hand side of a policy rule be something that policy makers have dire...
5 comments:

More on "Sumner Day": A little less frantic on my part

›
I want to do two things: first acknowledge the wisdom of Sumner's reaction to all this, and second link to someone that actually seems t...
3 comments:
Saturday, September 15, 2012

Lars Christensen on Bernanke-Evans in IS-LM

›
Here . Questions: 1. Do we think λ=∞, even if we accept a simple IS-LM set up regarding m? 2. Do we agree m is endogenous and a simple...
4 comments:
‹
›
Home
View web version
Powered by Blogger.