tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1740670447258719504.post8781648944520436068..comments2024-03-18T06:41:03.841-04:00Comments on Facts & other stubborn things: The reason Obama hasn't "explained Keynesianism" is because Obama is not a KeynesianEvanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12259004160963531720noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1740670447258719504.post-277811778127286202013-02-01T16:42:57.980-05:002013-02-01T16:42:57.980-05:00The guiding light for the Dems is Rubin, I think. ...The guiding light for the Dems is Rubin, I think. Or maybe Andrew Jackson. ;)Minnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1740670447258719504.post-84726209639892185162013-02-01T15:05:42.510-05:002013-02-01T15:05:42.510-05:00I doubt that even those who talk about Hayek reall...I doubt that even those who talk about Hayek really have a "guiding light." They talk about Hayek, but I'd question just how much about Hayek they actually know. It's one of the problems with politicians dropping names. I know libertarians would jump on the opportunity if a politician cited Keynes, but the most fair reaction, I think, would be to assume what we assume when they talk about Hayek: they only know a name and a distorted gist.Jonathan M.F. Catalánhttp://www.economicthought.net/blognoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1740670447258719504.post-47499293417760297412013-02-01T13:10:14.792-05:002013-02-01T13:10:14.792-05:00The point is that the Republicans are incoherent. ...The point is that the Republicans are incoherent. Obama does not have to involve himself beyond from time to time pointing out that the Republican position is incoherent. Absalonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09131268683451462949noreply@blogger.com