tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1740670447258719504.post4655877373811315269..comments2024-03-27T03:00:27.024-04:00Comments on Facts & other stubborn things: Assault of Thoughts - 2/23/2012Evanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12259004160963531720noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1740670447258719504.post-20321349574889387362012-02-23T22:24:44.435-05:002012-02-23T22:24:44.435-05:00There is a lot that I think Caplan misses, even if...There is a lot that I think Caplan misses, even if in certain ways I agree with him. Caplan, in his formal work (in a debate in QJAE, I believe), he takes the standpoint of Bayesian reasoning and pretends that it is "the" neoclassical perspective. I think it's rather obvious that neoclassicals are nearly always in the frequentist camp, which is who Kirzner is really attacking.<br /><br /><br />http://increasingmu.wordpress.com/2012/01/23/caplan-on-probability/Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com