tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1740670447258719504.post1836768982256623118..comments2024-03-27T03:00:27.024-04:00Comments on Facts & other stubborn things: The importance of historyEvanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12259004160963531720noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1740670447258719504.post-59412555171401937372011-09-29T20:13:55.005-04:002011-09-29T20:13:55.005-04:00No, what is important is the interpretation of his...No, what is important is the interpretation of history.<br /><br />As for Krugman's comment, I'd say, there is more to history than the 20th century.Gary Gunnelshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14463810435943252898noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1740670447258719504.post-34542962957241263562011-09-29T20:02:56.108-04:002011-09-29T20:02:56.108-04:00Krugman and Russ Robert agree: economics is not a ...Krugman and Russ Robert agree: economics is not a science.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com