tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1740670447258719504.post1469241100417224779..comments2024-03-27T03:00:27.024-04:00Comments on Facts & other stubborn things: Reminder on commentingEvanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12259004160963531720noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1740670447258719504.post-76175393135187541492012-11-08T15:26:59.161-05:002012-11-08T15:26:59.161-05:00Sorry, but that basically no sense at all. From t...Sorry, but that basically no sense at all. From the outside it looks like a system you've set so you've got something automatically to gripe about if someone gets on your nerves. Weird.<br /><br />Anyway, that sounds bubbletastic I guess.Czarhttp://www.czarsarereal.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1740670447258719504.post-26630559975791619252012-11-08T15:22:23.996-05:002012-11-08T15:22:23.996-05:00The blogger comment function is tough deal with fo...The blogger comment function is tough deal with for commenters. I don't want to close off that option because in most cases anonymous commenters are isolated comments that don't seem to come back and make reasonable points. Usually it's not a problem. So flexibility is nice.<br /><br />I really think you and I would both be better off if you just stopped commenting on this blog.Daniel Kuehnhttp://www.factsandotherstubbornthings.blogspot.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1740670447258719504.post-29068128461837818882012-11-08T15:15:31.525-05:002012-11-08T15:15:31.525-05:00Seems to me that if you didn't like anonymous ...Seems to me that if you didn't like anonymous comments you'd get rid of that option. Otherwise you provide an incentive to comment anonymously (and aren't you economist types all about incentives? that's what they keep on saying on the Freakonomics podcast). Just sayin'. Czarhttp://www.czarsarereal.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1740670447258719504.post-91133111350153062732012-11-08T11:48:35.526-05:002012-11-08T11:48:35.526-05:00Consistent pseudonyms are absolutely 100% OK and e...Consistent pseudonyms are absolutely 100% OK and entirely understandable. Sorry for the confusion.<br /><br />You are totally fine. It's the people who don't fill in a name and come up as "anonymous".Daniel Kuehnhttp://www.factsandotherstubbornthings.blogspot.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1740670447258719504.post-48138929332355527922012-11-08T11:43:38.337-05:002012-11-08T11:43:38.337-05:00I have made a deliberate choice to post anonymousl...I have made a deliberate choice to post anonymously. I am a philosophy PhD student, and whether or not I am correct, I have concerns regarding future employment prospects. I had similar concerns in my previous life as an NYC attorney (yes, partners in Big Law are very much "group think" types), so I hope you are not too aggressive with this policy. Humehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00471731654454581518noreply@blogger.com